Feature Requests

In make.com , if I create a scenario and all works, it will definitely break if I change the name of the field at a later time in SmartSuite. This is unusual behavior compared to competition like AirTable where it checks the name, and if it doesn't match, it updates it based on field ID. For a simple example, in SmartSuite I'll have a field called "Project Name". I'll create a make.com scenario and have a module look at "Project Name" and use it to move data. However, if I decide that in SmartSuite the column "Project Name" takes up too much width, and just "Project" is a better name, my make script will now break. I'll find out because my scripts will get errors and/or gaps in the information. If this were just 1 module I fix by hand in one scenario, no big deal. However, if I use that field in multiple places in a single scenario as well as multiple other scenarios, its a problem. In AirTable, when a field's title no longer matches, make.com has the correct programming to query AirTable and get the updated name, so a rename of a column is dynamic.

If you want to search by an ID, i.e.: 66a5e70966c030a478492943 “66a5e70966c030a478492943” [66a5e70966c030a478492943] [“66a5e70966c030a478492943"] You can't do this with the OOTB Find Records module. Instead, you need to use the Custom HTTP requests or make a lookup in SmartSuite for the ID and compare the two. Given the number of times one has to do this for a project it is cumbersome.

we're heavy Make users and noticed some issues with the existing SmartSuite custom app that you developed/maintain. From a usability standpoint and best practices @Make there are some things not working correctly. ​ I'm using the "Find Records" module and if it does not find a result, it should create one. However - after creating the record it still outputs "0" as the result. ​ Best practice would be to output the record details just as if it would have found it. That way - we can actually continue with the automation. Right now it happened a bunch of times that the record was created but not used in the subsequent automation as the module simply outputs 0. Can you please fix that?

Hey guys - it looks like the Dependency field is exposed via the API, but not in the Make module. Is that a heavy lift to expose it in Make? We're trying to build a project templating engine and this would help us be able to adjust a project timeline based on a planning kickoff or due date for a project

I want clients to be able to fetch all records from a table in SmartSuite, for use in another product, via the low-code Make platform (formerly Integromat). The SS API does allow for paginated record retrieval, but this is a hassle and not suitable for client-empowering low-code applications. The lack of this function directly in Make has broken many use cases and although I will be implementing the HTTP module workaround (see vid below), this makes me want to return to Airtable every time. Airtable has long had this functionality available on the Integromat/Make platform: As part of their 'Search Records' Function. https://www.make.com/en/help/app/airtable The frustration is shared by another consultant in this section of a recent YT video: https://youtu.be/OTRHYpolg-k?feature=shared&t=418

Hi please create integration with Zoho form